"Thorsten Froehlich" <fro### [at] charliecnsiitedu> wrote:

>In article <362f6649.0@news.povray.org> , "Mike Norton" <man### [at] ihatespamjpsnet>
wrote:
>
>>You said you could not see it, then how do you know if QTVr is faster?  Hmm?
>>
>>Just curious, Im going to post an image done with QTVr if no one else has
>>done it.  solidThinking now lets you output to the VR format.
>
>I look at it after posting this, yes, and then I walked over to a friend with a
WinDOS PC (P2 266). It looks terrible and seems to be very limited and difficult to
use (not very flexible) compared to Apples QT technology (which is proven for years
now). It takes me less than a minute to create a QT VR movie out of *free* tools by
simply drgging the output image (actually, POV-Ray Mac can directly output to
QuickTime Movies, this goes for single frames as well as *animations* - so I could
even directly create a digial video stream to upload to a digial video recorder via
FireWire...just to let you know :-) on the application,it will ask me I I want to
change the default compression and then I press a "Create" button and after 30 sec all
is done!
>(And note that a former POV-Ray team member, Jim Nitchals, worked on Apples
QuickTime!!! And is even mentioned as doing its optimzation on QT VR in the SIGGRAPH
95 paper...)

Thorsten;

PLEASE WRAP YOUR POSTS AT 80 COLUMNS !!!

Your posts are almost unreadable to some users of this group (including
myself). I will point out that I have asked you to do this before.

If you want reminding how your posts look outside your own newsreader, try
looking at the cgi web version of the above post -

http://www.povray.org/cgi-bin/dnewsweb?cmd=article&group=povray.general&item=5323

Post a reply to this message